Sales Compensation
By
Sam Boyer
The
primary expense for all beer distributors is payroll.
Control payroll and you control almost all the other variable
expenses of your operation. Beer
distributors that control payroll and manage it effectively will maximize
both their sales and profits.
Managing
your payroll dollars effectively to compensate your sales personnel is
more than a 100% commission system. Selling
beer is not like selling used cars. Beer
distributors can only sell to licensed retailers and you have exclusive
territories. If your sales
personnel skip retail calls...the retailers call your
distributorship…and demand a delivery.
If a used car salesperson does not close the sale…the customer
does not come back.
A
beer distributor’s sales are more stable and predictable than used car
sales. Therefore, a 100%
commission system within a beer distributorship is really 95% salary and
5% commission. Very similar
in performance to the 100% commission system is the paying of your sales
personnel a salary that is supplemented by only supplier incentives.
This approach promotes individual packages through distribution
incentives; it also promotes placements that may not be appropriate for
specific retailers and it does increase out of date product.
Beer
distributors that manage their sales payroll dollars effectively have
compensation programs that use a combination of salary, commissions, and
distributor based incentives. The
ideal balance between salary, commissions, and incentives is approximately
40% salary, 40% commissions, and 20% of total income from incentives.
Variances from this ideal are expected, however; the 20% of total
income tied to incentives is critical if management really wants to use
compensation as a tool.
Incentives
are the tools management has to focus the sales personnel on the products
and brands that will drive growth. Without
a well structured and managed internal incentive program for the sales
personnel a beer distributor will struggle and sales will falter.
What
types of incentives? Well,
incentives that will promote each family of brands and/or market segments
that require attention are a good place to start.
Look at the business plans you have submitted to your suppliers. If you submitted a plan to increase sales by 1.0 percent for
brand “A” then your incentive system should be structured to support
this plan. This approach
rolls your business plan commitments down to the sales staff.
As
an example, this support could take the approach of $200 per month
incentive for your flagship brand and $100 for the remaining packages of
that brand family. You also
have to consider all segments within your market.
Ask yourself, what segments, if we put extra effort into them will
yield increased sales? An
obvious segment is the on-premise. Often,
when analyzing compensation systems, no incentives are present to enhance
the on-premise segment. Could
this be the reason for the nationwide downturn in on-premise sales by all
major suppliers?
Other
segments can also be the focus of incentives; convenience stores, in many
instances, require additional effort to improve sales.
Convenience stores so often turn a good salesperson into an
“inventory clerk”. They
typically have a shelf set that cannot be changed.
However, the degree of execution within a convenience store can
still yield additional sales. Just
because the authorized display calls for a minimum 10 case display does
not mean only 10 cases. Plus
keep the display up as long as possible, perhaps even past the
“authorized” time period. Space
in a convenience store is a premium; if your salespersons have the space
tied up…your competitor does not. If
your sales incentive system encourages this…it will happen.
All
the above discussion is focused on volume goals for a set period of time.
There is another element to effectives sales compensation that must
be considered. In-market
retail execution is a critical aspect of every salesperson’s job.
If you have effective retail execution in the market by your
salespersons, and your product pricing is in line with your competitors,
you will be a formidable opponent, regardless of your brands.
An
effective retail execution program is the ongoing evaluation of a
salesperson’s actions against a set of established standards.
These standards, as an example, can take the form of “Ensure all
displays within your accounts include the applicable seasonal POS”.
This is just one of perhaps 30 to 40 scoring standards for each
salesperson. The total of
this scoring against the pre-established standards produces an incentive
payout for those who execute in the market.
Extensive
use of incentives for new placements could actually be counter-productive.
It is in a salesperson’s best financial interest to make sure
they achieve the maximum number of new placements of the products that are
covered by the incentive. However,
this can be done at the expense of the packages already carried by an
account. Retail accounts have
a fixed amount of space for your packages.
Typically, if a new package is sold to an account, an existing
package is taken out. The net
effect is the payment of incentive dollars to a salesperson for no change
in the total number of placements. This
may not only cost in incentive dollars, but the package removed from the
retailer’s shelves may be a better selling package than the new one.
The
use of volume goals for your flagship brand or for all the brands of a
supplier forces the salesperson to make sure the best selling packages for
that account are in the account. This
will maximize your sales and protect your brands long-term.
Your
current monthly incentive programs likely focus on individual packages and
display building. This is
understandable; your suppliers promote these programs.
You would be better served by implementing a quarterly volume
incentive program for each of your primary suppliers or brands.
This type of program requires the salespersons to sell all packages
in order to achieve their incentive pay.
They cannot obtain their incentive pay just by attaining sales on a
small number of packages. All beer distributors must do more to promote full-line
selling.
Making
the incentive period a quarter in length requires the salespersons to work
on selling the entire product line the entire length of the quarter.
This longer time period does not allow for “stuffing” an
account at or near the end of the period.
If the salespersons do not promote the entire product line
throughout the quarter they will not be able to make it up in the last few
days. This is now possible
with individual monthly package goals.
Beer
distributors have for many years allowed their suppliers to dictate their
compensation and in particular, how their incentive systems are
structured. Your suppliers
are just that, your suppliers.
Work with them to ensure the betterment of both your business and
theirs; however, do not allow them to dictate how you compensate your
sales staff. Beer
distributors have to take more control and responsibility for their
sales compensation. It’s
your business and sales compensation is the fuel that makes it run.
Make sure you have the highest-octane fuel available.